🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations worked, and revealed fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to reopen discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran was not yet able to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is walking a difficult course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president claiming the facilities had been destroyed. Afterward, Western states employed their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative the American negotiator only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Present Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if talks restart.

Trump recently stated he had been receiving messages that Iran desired to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet getting clear proposals from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of global regulations, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict revealed the clash could not be resolved by military means. He said the attacks began with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Resolution

Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the primary answer to settle disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a response in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He continued: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the aftermath of this assault."