🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime category has a new medium, or perhaps even a completely fresh vocabulary and grammar: police body cam footage. Faces of victims, observers and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, sometimes in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or torches as the officers approach, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we frequently catch sight of the faces of the officers themselves, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they know they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the Netflix true-crime documentary The Gabby Petito Case, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose main point of interest was officer recordings and in which, as in this film, the law enforcement seemed extraordinarily lax with the suspect. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, made exclusively of body cam film. Now comes a new film by Geeta Gandbhir about the tragic incident of Ajike Owens in a city in Florida, a African American woman whose four young kids allegedly harassed and tormented her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the authorities were repeatedly called, Lorincz fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when the victim went to the neighbor's residence to confront her about hurling items at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The arresting officers found proof that the suspect had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of danger. The documentary builds its story with the body cam footage generated during the repeated police visits to the scene before the shooting, and then at the disturbing and disordered incident site itself – introduced by 911 audio material of Lorincz contacting authorities in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also jail video of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Depiction of the Suspect

The documentary does not really suggest anything too complex about Lorincz, or any extenuating circumstance. She is obviously disturbed, although the kids are heard calling her “the Karen”, an ugly jibe. The film is showcased as an illustration of how self-defense regulations lead to senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the fact of gun ownership and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit notoriously said made gun deaths a price worth paying) is not much highlighted.

Police Interrogation and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the police interrogation scenes here and feel astonished at how little interest the police took in this aspect. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they may have done in recordings that didn’t make the edit). Or is gun ownership so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what seemed to her local residents a very long time, Lorincz was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another parallel, incidentally, with the a prior incident). And when she was finally officially taken into custody in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which Lorincz simply declines to rise, will not extend her arms for the handcuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose mental health means that she is unable to comply. Had the kid-gloves treatment up until that point led her to think that this could be effective?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is saved for the closing credits. A deeply sobering picture of U.S. justice and consequences.